next up previous
Next: Bibliography Up: An update of the Previous: Conclusions

Acknowledgements

Due to my service on army I could write this note only in this period even if the results shown here have been developed during the collaboration with Ludger Lindemann, and all Fsigma group, to study the $F_2$ structure function with '95 SVX data. For this reason I can say, only now, thank you to all Fsigma group and to the ``young dad''.



\begin{sidewaystable}
% latex2html id marker 241
[h]
{\tiny
\centering
\be...
...\ref{fig:bin}.
The values are given in percentage. }
}
\end{sidewaystable}


Figure: Comparison between data (dots) and MonteCarlo( hatched histogram)
\begin{figure}
\centerline{
\epsfig{figure=figure/show1.eps,clip=}}
\end{figure}
Figure: Comparison between data (dots) and MonteCarlo( hatched histogram)
\begin{figure}
\centerline{
\epsfig{figure=figure/show2.eps,clip=}}
\end{figure}
Figure: Results (open circle) on $F_2$ vs $x$ compare with the published ZEUS '95 SVX data (open diamond)
\begin{figure}
\centerline{
\epsfig{figure=figure/f2_cfr.eps,height=20cm,clip=}}
\end{figure}
Figure: Results (open circle) on $F_2$ vs $x$ compare with H1 95 (open square), ZEUS 94 (open diamond), BPC (cross) and E665,SLAC,NMC (solid circle). The solid line is the ZEUS NLO fit [3]. For the first 2 bins the uncertainties on the fit (shadow area) is shown, too.
\begin{figure}
\centerline{
\epsfig{figure=figure/f2_xt.eps,height=20cm,clip=}}
\end{figure}

next up previous
Next: Bibliography Up: An update of the Previous: Conclusions
Giulio D'Agostini 2004-05-05