next up previous contents
Next: Subjective probability and ``objective'' Up: Probability Previous: Subjective definition of probability   Contents

Rules of probability

Figure: Venn diagrams and set properties.
\begin{figure}\centering\epsfig{file=dago19.eps,width=0.9\linewidth,clip=}\end{figure}
The subjective definition of probability, together with the condition of coherence, requires that $ 0\le p\le 1$. This is one of the rules which probability has to obey. It is possible, in fact, to demonstrate that coherence yields to the standard rules of probability, generally known as axioms. At this point it is worth clarifying the relationship between the axiomatic approach and the others.

Since everybody is familiar with the axioms and with the analogy $ events\Leftrightarrow sets$ (see Table [*] and Fig. [*]) let us remind ourselves of the rules of probability in this form:

Table: Events versus sets.
Events Sets
    Symbol
event set $ E$
certain event sample space $ \Omega$
impossible event empty set $ \emptyset$
implication inclusion $ E_1\subseteq E_2$
  (subset)  
opposite event complementary set $ \overline{E}$ ( $ E\cup \overline{E} = \Omega$)
(complementary)    
logical product (``AND'') intersection $ E_1 \cap E_2$
logical sum (``OR'') union $ E_1 \cup E_2$
incompatible events disjoint sets $ E_1 \cap E_2 = \emptyset$
complete class finite partition $ \left\{ \begin{array}{l}
E_i \cap E_j = \emptyset \ \ \forall\, i\ne j\\
\cup_i E_i = \Omega
\end{array}\right.$


Axiom 1
$ 0 \leq P(E) \leq 1$;
Axiom 2
$ P(\Omega) = 1$ (a certain event has probability 1);
Axiom 3
$ P(E_1 \cup E_2) = P(E_1)+P(E_2)$, if $ E_1 \cap E_2 = \emptyset.$
From the basic rules the following properties can be derived:
1:
$ P(E) = 1 - P(\overline E) $;
2:
$ P(\emptyset) = 0$;
3:
if $ A\subseteq B$ then $ P(A) \leq P(B) $;
4:
$ P(A\cup B) = P(A) + P(B) - P(A\cap B)$.
We also anticipate here another rule which will be discussed in Section [*]:
5:
$ P(A\cap B) = P(A\,\vert\,B)\cdot P(B) = P(A)\cdot P(B\,\vert\,A)\,.$


next up previous contents
Next: Subjective probability and ``objective'' Up: Probability Previous: Subjective definition of probability   Contents
Giulio D'Agostini 2003-05-15