1. Empirical mean and standard deviation for each variable, plus standard error of the mean: Mean SD Naive SE Time-series SE mu 493.6769 0.01285 1.285e-05 3.564e-05 r[1] 0.8101 0.48421 4.842e-04 5.354e-04 r[2] 1.0698 0.69051 6.905e-04 9.878e-04 r[3] 0.8171 0.48464 4.846e-04 5.161e-04 r[4] 0.8903 0.53044 5.304e-04 5.713e-04 r[5] 0.8175 0.49282 4.928e-04 5.288e-04 r[6] 4.5338 3.03359 3.034e-03 4.704e-03 r[7] 1.1908 0.70179 7.018e-04 7.371e-04 r[8] 0.8121 0.48643 4.864e-04 5.035e-04 r[9] 2.0938 1.76421 1.764e-03 3.675e-03 2. Quantiles for each variable: 2.5% 25% 50% 75% 97.5% mu 493.6497 493.6680 493.6778 493.6872 493.697 r[1] 0.3588 0.5322 0.6889 0.9332 1.986 r[2] 0.4098 0.6661 0.9014 1.2591 2.736 r[3] 0.3617 0.5381 0.6958 0.9420 1.999 r[4] 0.3928 0.5865 0.7584 1.0274 2.175 r[5] 0.3608 0.5370 0.6954 0.9426 2.007 r[6] 1.3815 2.7852 3.8487 5.4038 11.809 r[7] 0.5333 0.7871 1.0145 1.3696 2.905 r[8] 0.3644 0.5374 0.6922 0.9338 1.979 r[9] 0.4660 0.9894 1.6476 2.6319 6.396As we can see, at this point the most suspicious measurement is the 6-th of the complete list, as we can better judge from the quantiles indicating that, for example, there is only about 2.5% probability that is below . Let us also give a look at the correlation matrix:25
mu r[1] r[2] r[3] r[4] r[5] r[6] r[7] r[8] r[9] mu 1.00 -0.15 0.33 0.07 0.15 -0.01 0.40 -0.11 -0.10 -0.61 r[1] -0.15 1.00 -0.04 0.00 -0.02 0.01 -0.06 0.02 0.02 0.10 r[2] 0.33 -0.04 1.00 0.04 0.05 0.02 0.14 -0.03 -0.03 -0.20 r[3] 0.07 0.00 0.04 1.00 0.01 0.02 0.03 -0.01 0.00 -0.03 r[4] 0.15 -0.02 0.05 0.01 1.00 0.00 0.06 -0.02 -0.01 -0.09 r[5] -0.01 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 r[6] 0.40 -0.06 0.14 0.03 0.06 0.00 1.00 -0.04 -0.04 -0.25 r[7] -0.11 0.02 -0.03 -0.01 -0.02 0.00 -0.04 1.00 0.01 0.07 r[8] -0.10 0.02 -0.03 0.00 -0.01 0.00 -0.04 0.01 1.00 0.06 r[9] -0.61 0.10 -0.20 -0.03 -0.09 0.02 -0.25 0.07 0.06 1.00The with some sizable correlation with the mass are, in the order, , and , i.e. those related to the individual results that mostly differ from the barycenter of the final pdf of the mass got by the MCMC sampling (see Fig. 15 in order to get an idea of the reason for the sign of each correlation coefficient).