 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 Next: Indirect measurements
 Up: Evaluation of uncertainty: general
 Previous: Evaluation of uncertainty: general
     Contents 
 
The first step consists in evaluating the uncertainty 
on a quantity measured  directly.
The most common likelihoods which describe the observed values
are  the  Gaussian, the  binomial and the 
 Poisson distributions.
- Gaussian:
- This is the well-known case of `normally' distributed errors. 
For simplicity, we will only consider  independent 
of independent 
of (constant r.m.s. error within the range of measurability), 
but there is no difficulty of principle in  treating the  general case.
The following cases will be analysed: (constant r.m.s. error within the range of measurability), 
but there is no difficulty of principle in  treating the  general case.
The following cases will be analysed:
- inference on  starting from a prior much more vague than 
   the width of the likelihood (Section starting from a prior much more vague than 
   the width of the likelihood (Section![[*]](file:/usr/lib/latex2html/icons/crossref.png) ); );
- prior width comparable with that of the likelihood 
   (Section ![[*]](file:/usr/lib/latex2html/icons/crossref.png) ): this case also describes the 
   combination of independent measurements; ): this case also describes the 
   combination of independent measurements;
- observed values very close to, 
   or beyond the edge of the physical region (Section ![[*]](file:/usr/lib/latex2html/icons/crossref.png) ); );
- a method to give unbiased estimates will be discussed
   in Sections ![[*]](file:/usr/lib/latex2html/icons/crossref.png) and and![[*]](file:/usr/lib/latex2html/icons/crossref.png) , 
   but at the cost of having to introduce
   fictitious quantities. , 
   but at the cost of having to introduce
   fictitious quantities.
 
- Binomial:
- This distribution is important for efficiencies
and, in the general case, for making inferences on unknown proportions. 
The cases considered include (see Section ![[*]](file:/usr/lib/latex2html/icons/crossref.png) ): ):
- general case with flat prior leading to the 
   recursive Laplace formula (the problem solved originally by Bayes); 
- limit to normality; 
- combinations of different datasets coming from 
   the same proportion; 
- upper and lower limits when the efficiency is 0 or 1;
- comparison with Poisson approximation.
   
 
- Poisson:
- The cases of counting 
experiments
 here considered2.15 
are (see Section ![[*]](file:/usr/lib/latex2html/icons/crossref.png) ): ):
- inference on  starting from a flat distribution; starting from a flat distribution;
- upper limit in the case of null observation;
- counting measurements in the presence of a background, when its rate 
   is well known (Sections ![[*]](file:/usr/lib/latex2html/icons/crossref.png) and and![[*]](file:/usr/lib/latex2html/icons/crossref.png) ); );
- more complicated case of background with an uncertain rate
    (Section ![[*]](file:/usr/lib/latex2html/icons/crossref.png) ); );
- dependence of the conclusions on the choice of 
   experience-motivated priors (Section ![[*]](file:/usr/lib/latex2html/icons/crossref.png) ); );
- combination of upper limits, also considering 
   experiments of different sensitivity (Section ![[*]](file:/usr/lib/latex2html/icons/crossref.png) ). ).
- effect of possible systematic errors (Section ![[*]](file:/usr/lib/latex2html/icons/crossref.png) ); );
- a special section will be dedicated to the lower bounds on the mass
   of a new hypothetical particle from counting experiments 
   and from direct information (Section ![[*]](file:/usr/lib/latex2html/icons/crossref.png) ). ).
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 Next: Indirect measurements
 Up: Evaluation of uncertainty: general
 Previous: Evaluation of uncertainty: general
     Contents 
Giulio D'Agostini
2003-05-15